|
|
|
±èÀ±¼÷ ( Kim Yun-Sook ) - Catholic University Seoul St. Mary¡¯s Hospital Department of Nursing
±èµ¿¿¬ ( Kim Dong-Yeon ) - Catholic University Seoul St. Mary¡¯s Hospital ±è³ª¿µ ( Kim Na-Young ) - Catholic University Seoul St. Mary¡¯s Hospital ±èÁø¼÷ ( Kim Jin-Suk ) - Catholic University Seoul St. Mary¡¯s Hospital ¾ç¿µÀº ( Yang Young-Eun ) - Catholic University Seoul St. Mary¡¯s Hospital Á¤À¯¹Î ( Jeong You-Min ) - Catholic University Seoul St. Mary¡¯s Hospital ÃÖÈñ¿µ ( Choi Hee-Young ) - Catholic University Seoul St. Mary¡¯s Hospital ¿ÀÀº ( Oh Eun ) - Catholic University Seoul St. Mary¡¯s Hospital
|
|
Abstract
|
|
¸ñÀû: º» ¿¬±¸´Â °£È£»çÀÇ ÀǵµÀûÀÎ °£È£¼øȸ°¡ ȯÀÚ°¡ ÀÎÁöÇÏ´Â °£È£¼ºñ½º Áú°ú °£È£»ç°¡ ÀÎÁöÇÏ´Â °£È£¼øȸ ÀνĿ¡ ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ¿µÇâÀ» È®ÀÎÇÏ´Â °ÍÀ» ¸ñÀûÀ¸·Î ÇÏ´Â ¼¼úÀû ¼³¹®Á¶»ç¿¬±¸ÀÌ´Ù.
¹æ¹ý: ÀǵµÀûÀÎ °£È£¼øȸ´Â ÅëÁõ(pain), ÀÚ¼¼(position), ¼ö¾×ÁÖÀÔ¼Óµµ(pump), ¹è¼³(potty), ¹°Ç°À¯Çü¼º (possessions) À» ±â¹ÝÀ¸·Î È®ÀÎÇϸç ȯÀÚ¿¡°Ô Áú¹®ÇÏ¸ç ¼öÇàÇÏ´Â °£È£¼øȸÀ̾ú´Ù. ¿¬±¸´ë»óÀº ¿¬±¸¸ñÀû¿¡ µ¿ÀÇÇÑ C ´ëÇк´¿ø 144¸íÀÇ °£È£»ç¿Í 149¸íÀÇ È¯ÀÚ·Î ¼³¹®Áö Àڱ⹮´äÀÛ¼ºÀ» ÅëÇØ Á¶»çÇÏ¿´°í, ¼öÁýµÈ ÀÚ·á´Â chi-test, t-test, ANOVA, Scheffe testÀ» ÀÌ¿ëÇÏ¿© ºÐ¼®ÇÏ¿´´Ù.
°á°ú: ÀǵµÀûÀÎ °£È£¼øȸ´Â °£È£»çÀÇ °£È£¼øȸ ÀνĿ¡ Áõ°¡¸¦ °¡Á®¿ÔÀ¸³ª À¯ÀÇÇÑ Â÷ÀÌ´Â ¾ø¾ú´Ù. °£È£¼øȸ ÀνĿ¡¼ °£È£»çÀÇ ÀÌÀ͸éÀÌ °¡Àå ³·Àº Á¡¼ö(3.36)¸¦ º¸¿´°í ȯÀÚ¿ÍÀÇ ÀÇ»ç¼ÒÅë¿¡ ÀÌÀÍÀ» Áشٴ ¸éÀÌ °¡Àå ³ôÀº Á¡¼ö(3.79)¸¦ Â÷ÁöÇÏ¿´´Ù. ÀǵµÀûÀÎ °£È£¼øȸ´Â ȯÀÚ°¡ ÀÎÁöÇÏ´Â °£È£¼ºñ½º Áú¿¡¼ °ø°¨¼º(Z=4.99, p<.001), º¸À强(Z=5.50, p<.001), ½Å·Ú¼º(Z=4.43, p<.001), ¹ÝÀÀ¼º (Z=4.43, p<.001) ¿äÀο¡¼ ±â´ëÇÏ¿´´ø °£È£¼ºñ½ºÁúº¸´Ù ½ÇÁ¦°£È£¼ºñ½º ÁúÀÌ ÁßÀ籺¿¡¼ À¯ÀÇÇÏ°Ô Áõ°¡ÇÏ¿´´Ù.
°á·Ð: ÀǵµÀûÀÎ °£È£¼øȸ´Â ȯÀÚ°¡ ÀÎÁöÇÏ´Â °£È£¼ºñ½º Áú¿¡ ±àÁ¤ÀûÀÎ È¿°ú¸¦ º¸¿©ÁØ´Ù, °£È£¼øȸ ÀνÄÀÇ Áõ°¡¸¦ À§ÇØ ÀǵµÀûÀÎ °£È£¼øȸ¸¦ °ÈÇÏ´Â °ÍÀÌ Áß¿äÇÏ´Ù.
|
|
Purpose: This descriptive study aimed to identify the effects of purposeful and timely nursing rounds on patients' perception of the quality of nursing services and nurses' perception of nursing rounds.
Methods: Intentional nursing rounds were conducted by communicating patients¡¯ questions on pain, position, pump, potty, and possessions. A total of 144 nurses and 149 patients participated, and data were collected using self-report questionnaires. The independent t-test, chi-square test, and Wilcoxon¡¯s rank-sum test were used to analyze the data with SPSS version 24.0.
Results: Although intentional nursing rounds improved the nurses¡¯ perception of nursing rounds, there was no significant difference. The nurses¡¯ benefit had the lowest score (3.36), and the benefit of communication with patients had the highest score (3.79). Intentional nursing rounds significantly improved the patients¡¯ perception of the quality of nursing services in the intervention group. Among the factors of empathy (Z=4.98, p<.001) related to the quality of nursing services as perceived by the patient, assurance (Z=5.50, p<.001), reliability (Z=4.43, p<.001), and responsiveness (Z=5.02, p<.001) significantly increased.
Conclusion: Intentional nursing rounds positively affected patients¡¯ perception of the quality of nursing service. It is important to improve intentional nursing rounds to enhance nurses¡¯ perceptions of them.
|
|
KeyWords
|
|
°£È£¼øȸ, ÀÎÁö, °£È£¼ºñ½º, ȯÀÚ ¸¸Á·, ÀǵµÀûÀÎ
Teaching rounds, Perception, Nursing services, Patient satisfaction, Intention
|
|
¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸
|
|
|
|
µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸
|
|
|
|
|
|